The latest KPMG and REC labour market data suggests those markets are changing in ways that traditional career advice has yet to catch up with.
Beneath the headlines of falling vacancies and cautious hiring is a much bigger shift: employers are becoming increasingly selective about where they invest talent.
Understanding that shift isn't just important for businesses. It's becoming essential for anyone making career decisions.
Much has been made of declining vacancies and subdued business confidence over the past two years. Read in isolation, those figures paint a pessimistic picture. The reality is more nuanced.
Permanent hiring remains subdued, but the pace of decline is slowing. Temporary hiring has strengthened to its highest level in more than three years.
Employers haven't stopped recruiting but they've become more deliberate about how they do it.
Instead of making long-term commitments, organisations are buying flexibility. Contract workers, interim specialists and project-based teams allow businesses to respond to uncertainty without increasing permanent overheads.
This isn't a broken labour market. It's a market repricing risk.
A few years ago, approving a vacancy was largely a budgeting exercise. Today, it's becoming a business case.
We recently spoke with a client who now requires hiring managers to explain, in writing, why AI cannot perform the role.
Whether that policy becomes commonplace or not, it captures a much broader shift in employer thinking.
Hiring is no longer the default response to increased workload. It's one option among many.
Can technology do it? Can we redesign the process? Can we automate it? Can we redistribute the work internally?
Only once those questions have been answered does recruitment become the solution.
And that changes the role of the labour market entirely.
Organisations are no longer hiring people. They're buying capabilities they cannot access any other way.
This is where traditional career advice begins to fall short.
For decades we've encouraged people to understand themselves.
That's still good advice. But it's only half the picture.
A career exists at the intersection of two forces.
The first is personal: your strengths, motivations and interests.
The second is economic: demand, scarcity, competition and opportunity.
Ignore either one, and the picture is incomplete.
Someone perfectly suited to a profession entering long-term decline faces a different future from someone with similar strengths entering a market experiencing sustained growth.
This is why labour market intelligence is no longer just useful for economists, recruiters and policymakers.
It belongs in career guidance.
Not because markets should dictate what people do. But because informed decisions require more than self-awareness.
The best career decisions are grounded in two questions:
Who am I?
and
Where am I most needed?
Career guidance has traditionally answered the first.
The next generation needs to answer both.
Because sustainable careers are built where personal strengths and market opportunity meet.
Making a career decision becomes easier when you can see both sides of the picture: what you want from your working life and where your skills could create value.
That's part of the thinking behind CareerBox, where you can access career support, CV and LinkedIn guidance, interview and job search advice, learning resources and career coaching.
You can also explore current opportunities with Denholm or use our AI Job Search to explore where your experience could take you next.
If you'd rather talk it through with someone, call us on 03303 359 818 or email connect@denholmassociates.com.
How can I work out which of my skills are becoming more valuable?
Look beyond job titles and think about the problems you know how to solve. Then look at where employers are investing, which skills repeatedly appear in vacancies and where organisations are struggling to find experienced people. Recruiters, professional networks and conversations with people working in adjacent sectors can also give you a more current view than job adverts alone.
Should I change career because demand for my current role is falling?
A changing market doesn't automatically mean leaving a profession you enjoy. It may mean understanding how the role itself is evolving. Look at which parts of your experience remain valuable, which new skills are appearing around them and whether those capabilities transfer into growing areas of your own sector or an adjacent one.
How can I tell whether my skills would transfer into another industry?
Start with the outcome your work produces. Commercial growth, project delivery, operational improvement, customer acquisition, organisational change and technical problem-solving can exist across many sectors even when the terminology differs. Understanding that underlying value can reveal options that aren't obvious from comparing job titles.
How should AI influence the career decisions I'm making now?
Look at how AI is changing the work within your profession rather than trying to predict whether an entire job will disappear. Which tasks are becoming easier to automate? Which responsibilities are gaining importance? Where are judgement, relationships, creativity, technical expertise or commercial understanding becoming more valuable? Those changes can help you decide what to learn next.
Is taking a contract or interim role a step backwards from permanent employment?
It can serve a very different purpose. Contract or interim work can expose you to new organisations, sectors, problems and ways of working while giving employers access to skills they need for a particular period. Whether it makes sense depends on what you want from the next stage of your career and the opportunities available in your market.
How often should I reassess where my career is heading?
You don't need to redesign your career every year. It is useful to keep an eye on how your profession and sector are changing, particularly when technology, regulation or employer demand begins shifting quickly. Small adjustments made early can give you considerably more choice than waiting until change forces the decision.